No Evictions campaign targets Jon Collins

Tagged as: evictions housing jon_collins nottingham_riots
Neighbourhoods: carrington nottingham
Published by group: GroupAutonomous Nottingham

A group of 20 people took part in a demonstration outside the Hucknall Road home of Nottingham City Council Leader Jon Collins today. The protest was a response to Collins’ threats to evict the families of council tenants found to have been involved in the riots, and his Council’s involvement in the Nottingham City Homes  scandal.

01-medium

02-medium

03-medium

04-medium

Flyerfront-medium

Flyerback-medium

The “corrupt landlord and enemy of the people” was targeted at his home to give him a taste of his own medicine. We unfurled a banner saying ‘No Evictions’ and handed out a few hundred flyers informing Collins’ neighbours about the issues. Many didn’t know about what was happening and were supportive.

The No Evictions campaign believes that the threat of evictions is “spiteful and should be fought, and that the families involved be supported every step of the way.” Evictions are an extra punishment to the harsh sentences already being given by the courts and one that would only apply to people living in council housing.

The City Council, led by Jon Collins, has a long and dubious record when it comes to its use of council housing, with a history of “wrongly giving homes to its employees, relatives, partners and friends”.  Earlier this year the investigation into the misuse of council homes by it’s housing service was dropped by the Council with no houses repossessed and all but one of the suspended staff back in their jobs. The Council also refused to call on the police to investigate.

Jon Collins was personally implicated in the misallocation of council housing. His secretary asked a housing officer for “a favour” to help one of council leader’s constituents gain a place on the waiting list for a new home.

The government says that people who allow their children to take part in riots don’t deserve to live in housing “subsidised” by the tax payer. However, a council tenant is not ’subsidised’. Council house tenants are merely paying a reasonable rent for their home to the local authority, unlike a private tenant who is paying an unreasonable rent to a private landlord. Who is subsidising who?

Grant Shapps, the Housing Minister wants to change the law so that council tenants convicted of offences which are not connected to where they live can be evicted in new fast track procedures, in addition to fast track evictions already planned for people who behave anti socially in or around their homes. The decision to evict whole families based on the actions of one member is nothing less than collective punishment.

If the council continues in its efforts to make families and children homeless in order to look tough on crime they can be assured that there are members of the public in Nottingham who will respond and make their disgust felt.

Links:

Link_go Report on Autonomous Nottingham

Email Contact email: nottsriotevictionsATriseupDOTnet

Comments

Others to watch

You might also want to have a quiet word with Cllr Alex Norris who is the portfolio holder for this sort of thing.

He was recently to be gloating about evicting a woman for drug offences

http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/Woman-evicted-drugs-raid-home/story-13529243-detail/story.html

Sample quote - "Social housing is a privilege, not a right..."

Cllr Collins

Cllr Collins, a Labour Councillor, has, since May this year, managed to trouser £27,035.51p of local taxpayers' money in "Allowances" and there's still 4 months' of cash-grabbing time before the financial year ends.

Privelage not Right

Who the hell do some of these people think they are?....

Being elected to serve the public or given employment as a public servant is a Privelage.... & it does not give anyone the Right to victimise innocent people/children, because they happen to live in the same accomodation as the actual law breaker....

How can it be lawful to evict people/children (who haven,t broken any law) from their home?..

If the law breaker lives alone, then that,s a different situation to be considered.... Otherwise, NO!!..

Surely there must be something in law or the UDHR that will protect the innocent parties in these cases.... Probably the UDHR is most promising, because politicians can & will change laws to suit their own agendas if they see fit.. Its even mentioned in this story I think? I,ll check..

Privelage not Right - 2

Yes, Surprise, Surprise.. Politician Shapps "wants to change the law".. Well, fancy that hey?....

Moving on.. "The Government says that people who allow their children to take part in riots, dont deserve to live in housing subsidised by the taxpayer"....

The people have NOT ALLOWED their children to take part in riots.. Children do all sorts of things that their parents dont/wouldnt ALLOW them to do.. As we all know, children above a certain age or level of maturity/sense, CANNOT be supervised or accompanied by parents 24 hours a day....

These vindictive politicians need to remember their position is a Privelage.. & doesnt give them the Right to punish people more than once for one crime.. If so, then if they allow one of their children to commit a serious crime, they wouldnt deserve to live in any accomodation subsidised by the taxpayer either.. Including 2nd homes they claim allowances towards..